ROYALSALUTE.CA WHY WE ARE HERE
RCN wins Poll!
More than 85% want Royal Canadian Navy
Admiral Landymore:
2010 Inductee to the RMC Wall of Honour!
Why the admirals are wrong:
The truth of the matter
A Royal Pain:
Nothing quite stirs the blood like Maritime Command
Return of the RCN?
Canada's naval forces could soon be called RCN
Admirals vs Sailors:
The sailors want it, but the admirals don't
Admiral McFadden:
E-mail lands naval officer in hot water
Christopher McCreery:
No permission from the Queen required
An Elegant Name:
Dr. Holloway on the elegance of R.C.N.
A Royal Name Game:
Navy says it didn't shut down RCN campaign
CN is a Railway:
Senate debates whether Canada belongs in the Navy
Senator Rompkey:
The absurd testimony of Senator Rompkey
Commander Thain:
Testimony puts Admiral McFadden on defensive
Opposing Admiral 1:
Don't Rock the Boat says Admiral McFadden
Opposing Admiral 2:
The unfortunate testimony of Admiral Summers
Opposing Admiral 3:
The unfortunate testimony of Admiral Buck
Opposing Admiral 4:
The unfortunate testimony of Admiral Mifflin
Hellyer Happy:
Mr. Milner happy with the Hellyer Legacy
Cliff Chadderton:
Canada's most prominent veteran supports us!
Rompkey's Motion:
Half exemplary, half unfortunate
Centennial Flag:
Dr. Holloway on a Flag that Falls Flat
Senate Debates
Motion to Change the Navy's Name
The government could do it, but it would have to speak out of both sides of its mouth. Even while calling it the 'Canadian Navy' they would have to admit that the Royal was never taken away. It would officially be the (Royal) Canadian Navy.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe for a minute that this will be the case for this government, but that's the only way I can see it happening if it did.
This post is very helpful, in describing how Royal designations do not expire, even as organizations may evolve, merge and change their names and structures. I would infer from Chris McCreery's expertise that the first commenter is probably right.
ReplyDeletehttp://rcn-rcaf.blogspot.com/2010/12/astounding-revelation.html
I'm still not sure I buy it. Perhaps a courtesy call has already been made to HM to let her know the Government's take on the issue. Even if it was determined that HM's formal permission was not required again, I can't see the harm in getting it anyway. Is there any conceivable reason she would say no?
ReplyDeleteI can't see that HM The Queen's permission is required again, given that "Royal" honours do not expire. But it would be classy to ask her...
ReplyDeleteHere's an idea - why not reintroduce the RCN when Prince William and Kate come for their official visit in July? The timing and optics (new generation of Royalty and continued relevance), couldn't be better...
Concur. My fingers are crossed.
ReplyDeleteThings take time, especially for a new government. I don't think it is realistic for the government to be ready in time for the royal couples' visit, but the 100th anniversary of the naming of RCN on Aug 29, 2011 is probably doable.
ReplyDeleteentirely free colorful site background objects http://casinogamesonlinee@blogspot.com
ReplyDelete